Home

Why the Persistent-Urgency to waken grantors of the EBA-1933-A.D.

A. The urgency of the #EBA-1933-A.D. -Trust Account-render, Settle, and Closure with the hope against the poverty the #EveryStateCountryMan has been enduring, and before Your-Trust- property is -again-encumbered. 2022-april-25-why-persistent

Download

B. TRANSLATION OF THE :

B) Specialty-Presentment to :Crown- :Temple -Inns, that :Roman-church: 1) Acquiesced Vacated the Concession-1213-A.D. Covenant -:Trustee Replacement in August 2020 A.D., and 2) thereby, have NO Authority to Negotiate for the Holy-church, etc. 3) cc: to Donald-John: Trump, -:POTUSA and :Michael: Pompeo, -:U.S.- :SOS

See: Specialty-Presentment to the Crown Temple

I wrote to the Executive branch c/o Donald, the POTUS, and to Mark the Sheriff

I wrote to Donald, the POTUS, and Jeff, the AG of the DOJ, and others in his department, and to Andrew, the acting FBI Director, and to the county Sheriff here, Mark. The cover letter shows to whom I wrote; it introduces the main paper, regarding my fundamental (inalienable- unalienable) rights and freedoms, and of the indifference and defiance against them as relates to the Supreme Law of the Land.

At the time of this entry only the Mark, sheriff and Elizabeth, the acting US attorney in Phoenix have received this declaration and documentation.

The cover points out my trip to the FBI office. You should know what to expect if you go there. And, if you must, I hope the experience is better.

See the pdfs:

1) Cover Letter to All; .address for crim complaint 03

2) Declaration and Documentation   2017_006522 wo even pages intentionally blanks

Racketeering In The Courts? Say It Ain’t So!

If you would hear of a court situation that is “sooo … unbelievable!” these days, you could believe any story was possible. Why? Because, some members of the courts impose their private will upon the people and entities entering a into controversy. There is No open access. So, Fairness, true, honesty then suffer in the “best interests” or the “best predetermined outcome” for their morality or immorality.

Bad? Yeah. This happens when court members pre-determine an outcome for a case. Of Course, the ends-justifies-the-means begins at the top of the slippery slope. And, then, like in my case, the court members pre- decide that disregard of my (or your) right does not serve their view of best interests. Their interests continue to morph and grow absolutely without Constitutional constraint like a cancer; bolder, justified and more bolder, common place, it becomes until, it no longer is hidden.

This is what has happened in the case of a Common-Law-Claim presentment i filed for suit at the Ninth Circuit Clerk of Court in Phoenix, Arizona: brash, open, absolute, denial of rights. This is wrong. Hard to believe? See the pdf:  LETTER 7 ALL; Then, Say It Ain’t So!